First proposing speech
Ladies and
Gentleman, on the 7th of February, inside the Fisht Olympic stadium,
the Winter Olympic games of 2014 shall be proclaimed open. The opening ceremony
will take place in front of roughly 40 000 spectators in the stadium and
millions of viewers worldwide. As competition and sports will be celebrated, media
attention will be focused on a resort town in Russia. Generally, the Olympics
are a cause for celebration, but for the past two years Sochi has been at the
heart of a major controversy that increased in magnitude to the level where we
got to the conclusion that a radical solution is needed. Therefore, this house
is in favor of a boycott of Sochi’s games. (Continues below.)
By YH
First opposing speech
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. As NEK said, the decision of going to Sochi or not will have a great influence on both the geostrategic role of Russia in the world and the way the citizens of the world will look at the human rights. Therefore, we have to consider every little thing for which we could be blamed if we don’t go. (Continues below.)
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. As NEK said, the decision of going to Sochi or not will have a great influence on both the geostrategic role of Russia in the world and the way the citizens of the world will look at the human rights. Therefore, we have to consider every little thing for which we could be blamed if we don’t go. (Continues below.)
By JD
First proposing speech
Ladies and
Gentleman, on the 7th of February, inside the Fisht Olympic stadium,
the Winter Olympic games of 2014 shall be proclaimed open. The opening ceremony
will take place in front of roughly 40 000 spectators in the stadium and
millions of viewers worldwide. As competition and sports will be celebrated, media
attention will be focused on a resort town in Russia. Generally, the Olympics
are a cause for celebration, but for the past two years Sochi has been at the
heart of a major controversy that increased in magnitude to the level where we
got to the conclusion that a radical solution is needed. Therefore, this house
is in favor of a boycott of Sochi’s games.
By boycott,
we do not mean a passive boycott. Not attending or watching the Olympics this
month would be a first step, but we are in favor of a more radical and efficient
decision. We intend to be as firm as the US were in 1980, when they forbid
they’re athletes from competing in Moscow. Out of ideological convictions, we
would not send a single team to the winter games.
In order to
show you the extent of the problems raised by Sochi’s games, I will show you
that supporting Sochi’s games is contradictory to our values of democracy and
freedom, Q will reveal the issues of the organization of the games and G will
try to convince you that a boycott would be an efficient solution.
The link
between sports and politics has always existed within the organization of the
Olympic Games. Despite the tensions that existed between the various cities, in
Ancient Greece, athletes were allowed to cross war-territories unarmed in order
to reach the place where the games were held. It reveals a degree of cohesion
between different countries which agree to compete in a formal context. Such
tolerance came from the fact that despite the fact that the countries where at
war, they had common ideologies, based on religion, that allowed the fighters
to let the pilgrims access the games without harming them.
The major
issue today is that the situation is such in Russia that we shouldn’t strive
for a consensus as the legitimacy of the government itself if questioned. In
particular, Wladimir Poutine who is currently at the head of the state, has
been elected in a questionable context: frauds where largely denounced, a case
of ballot stuffing was even taped on camera and the election was followed by
major demonstrations.
Olympic
Games give the opportunity to a country to give a positive impression to the
entire world. It can influence the way the country is perceived and Russia is
currently using it at it’s advantage. An example of that was the release of
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, a Pussy Riot member, who is convinced that she owes her
freedom solely to the fact that Russia is organizing the Olympics. Russia is
working on improving the perception of its laborious relation with human
rights, but at the same time, it is reducing its people’s freedom of speech by
adopting the ‘anti-gay propaganda law’. This law is intended to protect the
children according to the Wladimir Poutine - in fact, it is the propaganda
amongst minors that is banned - and allows the government to fine individuals
and organization. The ambiguity of the world ‘propaganda’ leaves a large place
to excess in the application of this law in a country where gay prides have
been forbidden several times those past years and where people still get beaten
up for no other reason than their ‘nontraditional sexual orientation’.
Nadezhda
Tolokonnikova claims that “going to the Olympics in Russia is an acceptance of
the internal political situation in Russia”. It shows that countries that are
attending do not believe that the lack of democracy is a major issue that would
justify any reaction. We do not intend to contradict our fundamental values by
helping a country promote itself when it is limiting the freedom of its
citizens.
We believe
that not taking any action that shows our global discontent in the current
political situation would be a mistake. It would implicitly show that we are
indifferent to the developments of the political evolution in Russia. We intend
to prevent any form of support of the Russian government through actions that
could help Russia improve the image of its country despite the fact that it is
currently limiting the rights of its citizens.
Thank you
for reading and vote for us.
YH
First opposing speech
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. As NEK said, the decision of going to Sochi or not will have a great influence on both the geostrategic role of Russia in the world and the way the citizens of the world will look at the human rights. Therefore, we have to consider every little thing for which we could be blamed if we don’t go.
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. As NEK said, the decision of going to Sochi or not will have a great influence on both the geostrategic role of Russia in the world and the way the citizens of the world will look at the human rights. Therefore, we have to consider every little thing for which we could be blamed if we don’t go.
Indeed, we believe that boycotting Sochi’s Olympics
because of a “boooh, Bad Russia, Bad Putin” general thinking, THAT is a pretty
bad idea. We are grown-ups, in a really complex world, balancing dangerous
equations whose variables are people’s lives and ideals for life…
Of course there are dangers, such as terrorism, the
question of peace with Georgia, security issues especially for American people,
questions about gay marriage… But our point is that, yes, Russia is a special, shutdown
country. Let’s be an example, instead of going on ruining the tiny bonds that
remain! Let’s open ourselves to this shadowed nation, marked by its dark and
uncertain past, desperately looking for its identity and shaping its new place
in this world, in which it used to be one of the rulers.
First, going to Sochi would mean initiate new bonds,
strengthen the old ones, and discover new points of view. Meeting different
cultures, considering them, understanding them, accepting them or not, that is
the spirit of the Olympics. This is why the 10000 athletes are gathered on the
Olympic Village, and almost live together during two weeks. The Olympics are
especially non-political, it is supposed to be kind of a neutral zone, both in
space and time, where ideologies are given up in order to focus on sports,
fraternity and love. We are not hippies, but we strongly believe that the
Olympics are one of the last worldwide events about fraternity, combining the
challenge of high-level sports and the nice gathering of a bunch of young,
self-confident people who represent their nations.
Then, the government tells us that we can’t ignore Russia’s
internal issues, such as the recent war in Georgia or the current polemic about
anti-gay campaigns. Going to Sochi is neither about ignoring anything, nor
accepting it. It is about minding our own business. Can you imagine Russia
boycotting Olympics in France because of La Manif Pour Tous or Dieudonné, or any
polemical subject? We don’t have to interfere in their private internal issues,
as we don’t want them to put their noses in ours. Concerning the gay marriage,
as far as we are concerned, we can have a bigger impact if we use our presence
in Sochi than if we just withdraw. We can calm down the current tensions by
showing our respect for everyone’s liberty without any provocation, by bringing
them a message: “it is ok back in France, we survived, keep calm”. It is
actually a long shot, but we can be witnesses, actors instead of casual
spectators.
Finally, we have to add that these Games will take
place, with or without us. We began to show you why it is important and useful
not to boycott these Olympics. My partners will go on with this task, about
which we sincerely care. Indeed, there are much more reasons to go to Sochi
next week. My favorite one is that we have a unique possibility to see dozens
of nations gathering to celebrate sport, commitment and fraternity, in a frame
made of joy, emotions and peace. It only happens once every two years, and we
would be ashamed and disappointed, not to be part this great adventure.
Athletes have worked so hard for this event, for four years they trained day
and night, every single day, aiming the time when they can finally join in with
this event; sometimes they have been dreaming of it since they were kids. We
have no right to prevent them from fulfilling this dream. We have no right to
forbid our people to support their team, body and soul until the last minute,
the last meter, the last jump. We have no right to break our team’s project.
And we certainly have no right to deny the fact that the Olympics are one of
these things that build relationships through the planet, no matter your color
or your origin. They make us citizens of the world.
JD
JD, you say that "we have to consider every little thing for which we could be blamed if we don’t go.", but shouldn't we also consider every little thing we could be blamed for if we do not show any discontent?
ReplyDelete"minding our own business" may be a principle regarding some situations, but is it really the best decision when a gay activist is beaten up and the police does not even arrest his assailant?
I like how concerned the first opposer is about the athletes' dreams, but the Olympics are not the only reason they train for. Winter sports exist on their own, have their world championships or world cups, where the level is (at least) as high as in the Winter Olympics.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, these athletes represent our country, which means they accept and should promote it's values : therefore they would probably support the boycott instead of seeing it as a disrespect for them !
JD, although I found you really convincing on the matter of the athletes' expectations, I was slightly disappointed by your argument " we don't want them to look at what we do so we should not look thouroughly at their actions". Well of course we want other people to tell us when we go wrong. Democracy would be threatened if we turned a deaf ear on criticism, and it is threatened in Russia. Acting as if everything was normal for fear of being wtched carefully only promotes controversial behaviours, such as Poutine's governing methods.
ReplyDeleteNonsense! Poppycock!
ReplyDelete