Proposers’ rebuttal speech
Ladies and gentlemen, good evening .We are writing today about
creativity .In fact , we are more and more facing difficulties in finding innovative minds,maybe because people are discouraged to think outside the box throughout
their lives. (Continues below the fold…)
by SM
Opposers’ rebuttal speech
Ladies and gentlemen, we have
all been (or are going) through the same education system. But what exactly is
the most important that comes to your mind when you recall your old days in
high school? Is it remorse for having wasted your talent and creativity? Or is
it gratefulness towards your math teacher for showing you different ways to
solve a differential equation? I have
been asking this question to many people and I have yet to encounter someone
who gives the first answer! (Continues below the fold...)
by CN
Proposers’ rebuttal speech
Ladies and gentlemen , good evening .We are writing today about
creativity .In fact, we are more and more facing difficulties in finding innovative minds,maybe because people are discouraged to think outside the box throughout
their lives.
"It all starts with our education system"
argued Sir Ken Robinson in his popular TED Talk. Indeed
, we still are teaching in school with the thought that mathematics are more important than arts , that physics
is the solution and theater is just an entertainment and the results is six
physics class per week and only one class of music or art .What I mean is that
our education system is drawing the student's direction making him confined to
it without having the choice to think
and thus to develop any skills which are not required in school .In consequence
we are creating new generation of workers without their own point of view or
without will to change anything. Creativity needs more than that !
In addition , we are living with
the idea that mistakes are bad . Sometimes in class , I
am scared to say something wrong : both
teacher and student may laugh on me. Well it is totally wrong to think
so because mistakes may be the best way to be creative . Ken
Robinson clarifies that for him if one
is “not prepared to be wrong” then one can “never come up with anything
original". Let 's take an example .In 1856 , Perkin ,an 18 years old
student , tries to synthesize the quinine by the process of the oxidation of
aniline. He obtains one blackish powder
which intrigues him and does not throw it. This
powder dissolves in the alcohol to give a surprising mauve color. is the
mauvéine, a new dye for the silk and the cotton which resists the wash and the
sun which finds a success lightening with the queen court of England. Hence,by
stigmatizing mistakes we are clearly educating pepole out of thier reative
capacities.
Actually , we all are born with a creative side . Normally we just have to
develop it . As a matter of fact , creativity is not just a skill but it is
also something to learn and especially to practice. Effectively , there are
rules to mature one's innovative side .Besides , art , music , theater, we can
find other educational methods that are important to call your creativity.
We had a brief insight about these methods this year during the
"ADPL" .The problem is that we were not enough aware to take profit from these classes
because we think that it is a loss of time. Unfortunately, it is not ! But this
prejudice is just a consequence of an
industrial education , our education system.
To conclude ,this house
strongly believe that our current education system is destroying creativity. we
are lead into an industrial education Forbidding us to think by ourselves and
thus to create .Don't you believe that we should more encourage the students to
cultivate their creative mind ? So please take this motion and vote for us.
SM
Opposers’ rebuttal speech
Ladies and gentlemen, we have
all been (or are going) through the same education system. But what exactly is
the most important that comes to your mind when you recall your old days in
high school? Is it remorse for having wasted your talent and creativity? Or is
it gratefulness towards your math teacher for showing you different ways to
solve a differential equation? I have
been asking this question to many people and I have yet to encounter someone
who gives the first answer!
It is all the more surprising,
therefore, to hear our friends from the proposing side go on about how our
education system is “killing” creativity.
Before going on in depth into
the debate, there is one peculiar thing about the motion that needs to be
clarified. And that is we need to know exactly of which education system are we
are referring to? Are we talking about our current education system as it is
right now? (Implying there was one point in time when things used to go a lot
better). Or is it our education system full stop, as it has always been? The
latter is a lot more daring and I seriously doubt that the proposing team would
go with such a bold statement, which would be a lost cause. Indeed arguing that
the education system has been destroying creativity since always would not be
plausible enough. For generations our society has been producing highly
creative people of all kind. Here is a list of the most creative people in
business according to Fast Company.
We
can all agree on the fact that these people are really creative. The thing is
they all went through the education system but still remained bright and
creative! One the other hand, if we assume that it is the current education
system which problematic, we will be implying that there was some point in time
when schools started destroying creativity. But then we will be basically
saying that the quality of our system has been decreasing throughout the years
(at least regarding creativity). Meaning there is less place for creativity in
the current system than it used to be. This is clearly not true because
throughout the years there has been more and more activities related to
creativity in our schools. To illustrate this point, let me give you an example
from my personal experience. Two months ago, we had the pleasure to welcome an
alumnus from our school on a lecture. And the topic discussed that day was
creativity. He couldn’t stop telling how lucky we are to have the opportunity
to address such topics in class. Two decades ago, went he graduated, there no
classes like that.
No matter how I look into this
assumption, I just can’t go along with it; our education system is not
destroying creativity, not now nor ever. Another question we should be asking
is: can creativity be destroyed? I highly doubt it. Our friend HC has provided
us with a good definition of creativity.
Creativity can also be defined as the process of producing something
that is both original and worthwhile.
As far as I am concerned, I believe that creativity is one of the most
primitive and outspread human features. Moreover
our raw creativity needs the right framework to blossom. And that framework is,
as pointed out by HC given by our education system. I have countless examples
of intelligent and highly skilled people who never achieved anything great
because they never had the opportunity to put their creativity into work.
It is a shame the proposing
team hasn’t given us yet their thoughts about creativity. I hope the next
proposers will do so; I am really looking forward to it. Thank you dear readers
and vote for us!
CN
Dear proposers, as you deliver your speeches, what you are talking about becomes less and less clear... You keep opposing science to art, and unless you clarify your definition of creativity, I totally do not agree with this ! Engineers ARE creative...aren't you creative, S.M. ? Even mathematicians are creative ! By the way, you are on the proposing side, so why do you mention that you had creativity training ? ;)
ReplyDeleteWhy "even mathematicians", E.N? Especially mathematicians should you say!
ReplyDeleteThink about your scientific philosophy class! Mathematicians, like Alain Connes (with its operator algebra's theory), thoroughly revolutionized the way we can interpret the "bing bang", ie the origin of the universe!
Isn't that creative enough to you?
EN, I think that the problem is that the proposition mistook a rational debate for a psychoanalysis session during which one can rampage about their own neuroses. Yes, we all agree, doing physics and mathematics at a demanding level is – well – demanding. It takes time and requires great sacrifice. If your alternative is doing less work, I don’t think you are going to be more creative, especially in the subject matters – physics and mathematics – you embraced. If however you want to be creative in art, of course you should study art. But that’s not the point.
ReplyDeleteHowever, you might say that what is the crux of the problem, is precisely that you didn’t choose. Let’s put it more bluntly. You ended up in an engineering school: maybe you wanted to be a diplomat. Or a pianist. Or a street dancer. Or whatever might cross your mind. But think twice: the reason you are thinking about this is that you achieved a certain degree of independence of thought. You earn this independence. And you earn it because you worked hard. Now you can choose freely.